Engineering education is seriously broken

  • Guaranteed debt, uncertain return

    The cost of pursuing a degree has skyrocketed over recent decades, as has student debt - which now averages around $40K.  And the long-term financial benefit of choosing to attend college has gone from a sure thing to an even-odds gamble. 

  • A Sputnik curriculum

    Engineering schools are still teaching a 1960s curriculum: two years of math-science death march, a long list of technical classes. Professional and entrepreneurial skills? An afterthought. Preparation for a world in which AI will be ubiquitous? Let’s practice some calculus instead.

  • Stale methods, hostile culture

    The teaching methods in engineering are outdated too: lecture-heavy, exam-based, and disconnected from real practice. Combined with a pervasive weed-out culture, it's no wonder 30% of students leave in the first year, only one-third graduate in four years, and many never choose engineering to begin with.

  • Education in a bubble

    The disconnect between the academy and industry continues to grow. Employers are dissatisfied with what graduates can do; many tell us “well, we just tell them to forget what they learned in school.”  

We need to do better.

The challenges our nation and our planet faces demand engineering solutions, more engineers, and better engineers - more than ever. 

But if we’re going to bring more students into the field, and help them become the kinds of engineers the future requires, we need to make engineering education more affordable, more engaging, and more effective than it is today.